Qwen3.8-Max API TWD Cost 2026: AA Index 45.4, Flagship
Qwen3.8-Max is live on BazaarLink at 45.4 on Artificial Analysis, above Claude Opus 4.8's 41.8. Covers USD/NT$ prices, Kimi K3 comparison, and fit.
Query date: 2026-09-20 (Taipei time). Benchmark data comes from the live Artificial Analysis website page. Pricing follows the USD unit prices shown on the BazaarLink models page, and the exchange rate is 1 USD = NT$ 31.5.
Qwen3.8-Max is Alibaba's latest flagship model: a 2.4-trillion-total-parameter MoE architecture (about 95 billion parameters active per inference), a 1-million-token context, and deep reasoning. After its listing on BazaarLink, you can call it directly with the model name qwen3.8-max.
Bottom line up front: Qwen3.8-Max scores 45.4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. The order among the three is Qwen3.8-Max 45.4, GLM-5.3 44.8, and Kimi K3 43.6, and its price is lower than both of these flagships. Its generation speed is the slowest of the three (39.0 tokens/second), so keep this in mind when evaluating latency-sensitive scenarios.
Want to call Qwen3.8-Max and pay in TWD with a unified invoice that carries your tax ID? BazaarLink offers an OpenAI-compatible route with the same model unit prices, plus a 10% top-up service fee, addressing the expense-reporting pain point for Taiwan companies. See the complete guide to AI API expense reporting for Taiwan companies for details.
Third-party benchmark: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
(Data from the Artificial Analysis website's qwen3-8-max model page, query date 2026-09-20)
| Model | Intelligence Index | Output speed |
|---|---|---|
| Kimi K3 (Max) | 43.6 | 37.6 tokens/second |
| GLM-5.3 (Max) | 44.8 | — |
| Qwen3.8-Max | 45.4 | 39.0 tokens/second |
| Claude Opus 4.8 (Max, for comparison) | 41.8 | — |
Qwen3.8-Max is currently one of the higher-scoring models in the Chinese camp. The order among the three is Qwen3.8-Max 45.4, GLM-5.3 44.8, Kimi K3 43.6. This score has been revised before: Artificial Analysis's first measurement was 53, but it later found that some tests ran on an endpoint with intermittent issues, and after re-running, the score recovered to 56. When citing third-party benchmark figures, keep this revision history in mind: a score is not permanently fixed once a single test is done.
Price comparison (USD ↔ NT$)
| Model | Input USD/MTok | Output USD/MTok | NT$ input | NT$ output | vs Opus 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8-Max | $2.00 | $6.00 | NT$ 63 | NT$ 189 | 0.24× |
| Kimi K3 | $3.00 | $15.00 | NT$ 95 | NT$ 473 | 0.6× |
| Claude Opus 5 | $5.00 | $25.00 | NT$ 158 | NT$ 788 | 1.0× (baseline) |
Cache-hit input $0.25/MTok (NT$ 7.9). The prices in this table match the BazaarLink models page, with no model markup. For the latest unit prices, see BazaarLink Models.
Scenario estimate: deep-reasoning batch tasks (NT$/month)
Assumptions: 300 reasoning tasks per day (math, logic, code analysis), each with 3,000 input tokens and 1,200 output tokens.
- Monthly tasks: 300 × 30 = 9,000 calls
- Monthly input tokens: 9,000 × 3,000 = 27,000,000 (27 MTok)
- Monthly output tokens: 9,000 × 1,200 = 10,800,000 (10.8 MTok)
Cost:
- Input: 27 × NT$ 63 = NT$ 1,701
- Output: 10.8 × NT$ 189 = NT$ 2,041
- Total: NT$ 3,742/month (≈ USD 119)
→ The same workload on Kimi K3: NT$ 7,830/month (1.1× more expensive, and 1.8 points lower on the intelligence index); on Opus 5: NT$ 12,780/month (2.4× more expensive). For batch tasks that are highly cost-sensitive and can tolerate slower speed, Qwen3.8-Max is the cheapest of the three Chinese-camp flagships.
Specs
- Context length: 1,000,000 tokens
- Deep reasoning, with support for structured output
- Model ID:
qwen3.8-max(compatibility alias:qwen/qwen3.8-max)
How to call it
curl https://bazaarlink.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer sk-bl-YOUR_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "qwen3.8-max",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}]
}'
OpenAI SDK compatible; just change base_url and model, no other code changes needed.
When to choose Qwen3.8-Max, and when not to
Good fit:
- Deep reasoning, math, and code analysis tasks where cost is the main consideration
- Cases where you have already evaluated Kimi K3 / GLM-5.3 but found that the extra cost does not buy a proportional quality gain
Not a good fit:
- Latency-sensitive real-time scenarios: at 39.0 tokens/second, it is the slowest of the three Chinese-camp flagships
- Tasks that require visual input: the specs compared in this article cover only text, so for multimodal needs, first confirm the actual supported scope
Sources and query log
- Artificial Analysis: Qwen3.8 Max model page (query date 2026-09-20)
- BazaarLink Models: Qwen3.8-Max (unit prices and specs; query date 2026-09-02)
- Further reading: How do I expense AI API costs in Taiwan? 2026 complete guide, DeepSeek API TWD cost estimate 2026
Explore current model discounts and learn how usage rebates add credit to your balance.
View discounts and usage rebatesFAQ
What is the model ID of Qwen3.8-Max?
The model ID is qwen3.8-max, with the compatibility alias qwen/qwen3.8-max. When calling through BazaarLink, set the model parameter to either one. It is OpenAI SDK compatible, so you only need to change base_url and model.
Does the Qwen3.8-Max intelligence index score keep changing?
Yes. Artificial Analysis first measured 53, then found that some tests ran on an endpoint with intermittent issues. After re-running, the score recovered to 56. Third-party benchmark scores change with re-tests and method updates, so they are not fixed after a single test.
What input formats does Qwen3.8-Max support?
Text input and text output, with a context length of 1,000,000 tokens. It supports deep reasoning and structured output.
How much cheaper is Qwen3.8-Max than Kimi K3?
Qwen3.8-Max costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens, which is cheaper than Kimi K3 ($3.00 input / $15.00 output), and it scores 1.8 points higher on the intelligence index (45.4 vs 43.6). It suits cost-sensitive scenarios that still want a higher score.
Is the BazaarLink price for Qwen3.8-Max the same as the official price?
Yes. BazaarLink does not add a markup to model unit prices (priceMultiplier = 1.0). The difference is in billing: BazaarLink uses a prepaid USD balance, can issue Taiwan unified invoices, and charges a 10% service fee on top-ups.
Can I get a Taiwan unified invoice with my tax ID for Qwen3.8-Max?
Buying directly from the Alibaba Cloud website does not give you the three-part (triplicate) unified invoice that companies can use for tax deduction. Although Alibaba Cloud has registered on the Ministry of Finance's offshore e-commerce list, that registration obligation only extends to two-part (duplicate) cloud invoices for individual consumers. Calling Qwen3.8-Max through BazaarLink, a Taiwan company issues a unified invoice that can carry your tax ID, so you can file it directly for expense reporting. See [How to use the Qwen API in Taiwan, and can you get a unified invoice?](/blog/qwen-api-taiwan-invoice) for details.
TWD billing · Taiwan invoices · leading AI models · OpenAI-compatible API